Author: chris

Note: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

Recommend a strategy for communication with Get Well Drugs in order to determine if the drugs supplied by this manufacturer are within benchmark standards set forth by the FDA.
Outline a plan for asking questions directed toward Get Well Drugs about any FDA regulations which may be applicable to your local hospital.
Outline a plan for communicating these findings to a local consortium of nurses and physicians at your hospital. This plan must include, at a minimum, the cost of the drugs, as well as the types of drugs for use in mental, behavioral, and general services.
Conclude your findings, in which you suggest the pros and cons of using Get Well Drugs.
Use at least four (4) recent (i.e., last five [5] years), quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

· Explain the major components of the U.S. health care system, their functions, and the relationships among these components.

· Use technology and information resources to research issues in health services organization.

Write clearly and concisely about health services organization using proper writing mechanics.

:
Module 4

Case Study #3

Heather: A Sudden Death

Heather was 24-years old. She was just beginning her second year as a 7th grade math teacher and was to be married to her high school sweetheart in two months. Heather was driving to school when she was hit by a truck that ran a red light. She sustained multiple fractures, head injury, and extensive internal injuries. Her parents and older brother were informed on arrival at the E.R. that her chances for survival were extremely low. She was taken to the operating room but after 3 hours of surgery with uncontrollable bleeding and several resuscitation attempts, she died in the O.R. A clinical nurse specialist, who is on the rapid response team at the hospital, was called to be with the family when they arrived at the hospital. She stayed with them after they received the news of Heather’s death.

Discussion Questions:

1. How is grief from this sudden death likely to differ from death resulting from chronic illness?

2. What communication strategies would be helpful for the clinical nurse specialist to use with Heather’s parents on their arrival to the ER? While she is in surgery? At the time of her death?

3. What kind of grief would the fiancée likely experience? What types of interventions would be helpful? How might his grief differ from Heather’s parents and siblings?

:

• Question: What explains China’s cooperation and noncooperation within international regimes when dealing with environmental issues?

• Answer: Realism, Neoliberalism, Cognitivism each explains parts of China’s behavior.

• Analysis Part 1: Realism explains this aspect of China’s behavior…..
• Analysis Part 2: Neoliberalism explains this aspect of China’s behavior…..
• Analysis Part 3 if relevant: Cognitivism explains this aspect of China’s behavior….
• Conclusion: Say something about, for example, future changes or policy challenges in the realist or neoliberal or cognitive part of your topic .

Guidelines for Senior Capstone Paper
A senior capstone paper is 2,800 words +/- 10% (these word-counts exclude footnotes).
Organize your paper as per the GRADING CHECKLIST on the next page; use subheadings to separate the main sections, and have relevant paragraphs within each section
Cite at least 4 scholarly sources, and optionally some other sources, on the main topic of your paper (this is in addition to any scholarly sources on the theoretical framework). Scholarly sources are books, typically from a university press or other major press, as well as scholarly journal articles (a journal article is typically 10-20 pages with citations and footnotes). The other sources can be less-scholarly, such as newspapers, Time, Newsweek, the internet etc.
The Submission Timeline is as follows:

First Submission: Nov 24, by 9 am in the morning.
Introduction (about 400 words); then sketch out your main analytical sections, writing about 6-8 sentences for each analytical section (about 400 words for all the relevant analytical sections). Use subheadings to separate each section and use paragraphs to separate each point within the section.
Come to class this day for further instructor feedback on your paper.

Final Submission: Dec 8 evening (this is the final-exam time for this class; there is no final exam and this is the time for the final submission of your paper). Submit the full paper on blackboard.
• When you submit the completed project, provide copies of your 4 scholarly sources (i.e if you refer to pages from a book, please scan the book cover page; if using a journal article, please scan the title page).
• At the end of the paper, write the word count.
• Use Single Space and 12 point font.
• Please do not write your name on the assignment, write only your university ID M-NUMBER.
• Cite all sources in Footnotes
FOOTNOTE and CITATION FORMATS
Cite your sources in Footnotes.
Mention the full form the first time you cite an author, and only the abbreviated form the second time you cite. The Full form is author name, title of work, (for a book) place of publication, year, and page reference; (for an article) journal title, issue number, date/year, and page reference.
Books:
Jimmy Burns, The land that lost its heroes: the Falklands, the war, and Alfonsin (London: Bloomsbury, 1987), p. 131.
Subsequent mentions: Burns, The land that lost its hereos, p.478.

GRADING CHECKLIST –

1. Introduction (300-500 words): [Grade: Poor — Okay/Adequate — Thorough / Good]
• What is the question you are exploring?
• What is the Analytical Framework or Theoretical Framework to answer the question
The Analytical Framework or Theoretical Framework is, in its most basic form, as follows:
X1, X2, X3….. explain Y.
When X1 is present/high/etc and/or X2 is present/high/etc, then Y is present/high/etc
When X1 is absent/low and/or X2 is absent/low, then Y is absent/low

Other Forms are
X1 explains one aspect of Y; X2 explains another aspect of Y; etc etc.

Y involves X1a, X1b, X1x; and X2a, X2b, X2c

• What is your short answer to the question
• Mention the Organization of the paper,—i.e. the first section will deal with …, the second section will deal with …, the third with…..

2. Historical or Basic Background (300-500 words; a simple historical and technical description of the issue)
[Poor — Okay/Adequate — Thorough / Good]

3. Analysis Part 1
[Poor — Okay/Adequate — Thorough / Good]
DISCUSS THE CASE IN SOME TIME-PERIOD (OR SOME ASPECT OF THE CASE), BY DISCUSSING X1, X2,…Y AS RELEVANT.

4. Analysis Part 2
[Poor — Okay/Adequate — Thorough / Good]
DISCUS THE CASE IN A SECOND TIME-PERIOD (OR SOME OTHER ASPECT OF THE CASE, OR SOME OTHER CASE IF YOUR PAPER IS COMPARING TWO CASES) BY DISCUSSING X1, X2,…Y AS RELEVANT.

5 if relevant. Analysis Part 3-4-5
[Poor — Okay/Adequate — Thorough / Good]
If Relevant REPEAT THE ANALYSIS FOR OTHER TIME-PERIODS OR OTHER CASES AS RELEVANT.

6. Conclusion (about 300words)– (this should summarize the main point/analysis and logically extend it to provide some broader inference/conclusion).
[Poor — Okay/Adequate — Thorough / Good]

7. Quality of writing
[Poor — Okay/Adequate — Thorough / Good]

8. Adequacy of Analysis/Theoretical Framework
[Poor — Okay/Adequate — Thorough / Good]
Does the paper have a real analytical/theoretical framework, or is it just describing the issue without a framework

Overall: Poor (1 pt) — Okay/Adequate (2pts) — Thorough / Good (3 pts) x …

A paper that simply ‘describes’ an issue gets a maximum grade of ‘B’; the analysis adds to this up to grades of B+, A-, or A.

Comments from Support Team:

ils:
Hey,

I need help with my Financial plan for my product(mobile table) that you helped me with last time.

What is my product?? mobile table (new invention). Its features – light weighted table that is made of aluminum. -you can place it in your back bag or laptop bag. – it has mobile charger that has USB input and outlet. My customers could be students, Businessman, Traveler, Schools and organisations.( And my product will be produce in China and will be sold to the disturbers Home Depot and Walmart etc.)

I need you to fill in the excel sheet with estimate number based on my documents about the product and your research. And then copy the excel sheet to word page and then write about one page explaining the numbers? how you come with this numbers? talk about the cost of the mobile table? in cash flow sheet answer the questions in the bottom?
(whorehouse) could go under (other) in the excel sheet. also consider the security deposit.
Note: “SCORE_Financial_Projections” is the file that you gonna use to fill in the numbers.
let me know if you have any questions
Thank you
Comments from Support Team:

0
Paper details:
Specifically, the Final Reflection should:
1. PROVIDE A GENERAL OVERVIEW (introduce and describe your work in the past semester), class discussion, team work , peer editing research etc.
2. DISCUSS YOUR BEST PAPER (individual or team paper) in some detail and justify why it is your best work,
why it is my best paper why it was interesting why why why?
3. ILLUSTRATE YOUR DEVELOPMENT AS A WRITER (by pointing to specific work you generated for this course)
4. CONCLUDES WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS YOU HAVE GAINED (Can you implement any earned skills and knowledge in your future writings?)

the three new styles i have learn in this class are Auotobio Narrative, Exploratory Essay, and surprising project

0
Paper details:
Directions: write an essay in respones to this question, answering each part fully.
no outside sources from any website, if you are not follow, you will get a 0 point.
use the scources from the reading given, if you have any questions, feel free to contact me

1. advance and define Your Own definition and theory of rhetoric. In presenting your theory, address the following issues:

a.0
Paper details:
Directions: write an essay in respones to this question, answering each part fully.
no outside sources from any website, if you are not follow, you will get a 0 point.
use the scources from the reading given, if you have any questions, feel free to contact me

1. advance and define Your Own definition and theory of rhetoric. In presenting your theory, address the following issues:

a. What is rhetoric?

Rhetoric- art of comfort, persuasion,expression, crital thinking, ethics, power, style, enlightement, new knowledge, truth, postmodern , male&female voices

b. Choose ONE of these metaphors that has help you understand rhetoric the most

Metaphor: Love, Art( expressive, eyes, reflect reality, entertainment, visual, awe) , Medicine, Magic, War

C. after that, PERSONALLY define this metaphor( i.e. what to you is Art, is lovem is war, ect…drawing from your own experience and examples)

d. this is the important part, explain/ parallel how it is similar to your idfinition of rhetoric: Why would you choose this metaphor to describe rhetoric? what are their similar features? what are the differences?

Rhetoric- art of comfort, persuasion,expression, crital thinking, ethics, power, style, enlightement, new knowledge, truth, postmodern , male&female voices

b. Choose ONE of these metaphors that has help you understand rhetoric the most

Metaphor: Love, Art( expressive, eyes, reflect reality, entertainment, visual, awe) , Medicine, Magic, War

C. after that, PERSONALLY define this metaphor( i.e. what to you is Art, is lovem is war, ect…drawing from your own experience and examples)

d. this is the important part, explain/ parallel how it is similar to your idfinition of rhetoric: Why would you choose this metaphor to describe rhetoric? what are their similar features? what are the differences?

Write an essay on the politics surrounding confirmation politics? What is the constitutional process for appointing judges and justices? When did confirmation politics begin to become problematical? Does the Senate’s “advise and consent” authority include the right of a minority of senators to filibuster judicial nominees? What are some proposals for reform that would respect both the president’s prerogative to fill judicial positions while also respecting the Senate’s constitutional right to “advise and consent”?
Comments from Support Team:

:
Write an essay on the politics surrounding confirmation politics? What is the constitutional process for appointing judges and justices? When did confirmation politics begin to become problematical? Does the Senate’s “advise and consent” authority include the right of a minority of senators to filibuster judicial nominees? What are some proposals for reform that would respect both the president’s prerogative to fill judicial positions while also respecting the Senate’s constitutional right to “advise and consent”?
Comments from Support Team:

Write an essay on the politics surrounding confirmation politics? What is the constitutional process for appointing judges and justices? When did confirmation politics begin to become problematical? Does the Senate’s “advise and consent” authority include the right of a minority of senators to filibuster judicial nominees? What are some proposals for reform that would respect both the president’s prerogative to fill judicial positions while also respecting the Senate’s constitutional right to “advise

:
From an evolutionary perspective, short-term exposure to stress is adaptive and necessary for survival. Unfortunately, long-term exposure to stress is considered maladaptive, yet common, in Western society. Describe some adaptive effects short-term stress has on the brain versus some maladaptive effects long-term stress has on the brain.
Comments from Support Team: