Comment:
Write a critical review as if you served as a manuscript referee for the journal. In the review, focus on the following points: (1) Significance to the field of mass spectrometry or science in general (2) Adequacy of experimental or theoretical approach (3) Logic (are there any errors, jumps, stretches, etc.) (4) Data quality and presentation (5) Literature references (whether or not adequate) (6) Paper length (whether commensurable with significance) Start the review with briefly summarizing the main positive aspects of the paper. Most importantly, your review should provide a qualified, detailed, and justified critique to help the authors improve the paper and also indicate to the Editor what should be the course and extent of revision. No paper is perfect (not even those already published!) Suggest additional experiments and/or interpretations that might elucidate unclear points or vague conclusions. Also point out if the paper had missed relevant references that were available at the time of submission. To write a qualified review, you will have to read several other papers related to the one under review. The absolute minimum is the references cited in the paper under review that should be used as primary leads to further literature. SciFinder will help you with getting more info on the area of research addressed in the paper under review. Link to groups final revised paper with reference links: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.3788/full
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]