“The Use of Precedent as Binding Authority” Please respond to the following:
- Analyze the use of precedent as binding authority on lower courts. Discuss whether, in your opinion, such use is an effective way to ensure uniform application of the law to a case. Provide two (2) examples of the related use of precedent to support your rationale.
- From the first e-Activity, examine both concepts of stare decisis and precedents, and distinguish between the two (2) concepts. Discuss whether these doctrines are persuasive authority or binding authority. Provide two (2) examples of the concepts in use to support your rationale.
Respond to this post 50 to 100 words keep separate from question
Analyze the use of precedent as binding authority on lower courts. Discuss whether, in your opinion, such use is an effective way to ensure uniform application of the law to a case. Provide two (2) examples of the related use of precedent to support your rationale.
The use of precedent as binding authority on lower courts means that the lower courts are bound to follow an applicable holding of a higher court in the same jurisdiction. This is an existing law that lower courts are bound to follow. A lower court may not rule against a binding precedent, even if the lower court feels that the precedent was unjust. They can only hope that the higher court will reform the rule in question. The use of “Stare Decisis“, meaning to stand by things decided, is important to follow so that the applicable rule of law used. However, every case is different and unique and should be treated as so. Personally, I am on the fence about how effective binding authority is. I do agree with looking back at previous cases to see what was decided, but I do not think that we should rule solely by reason of precedent. We should examine all the facts of the case and make a decision based off of what is presented and use precedent to further support our case.
From the first e-Activity, examine both concepts of stare decisis and precedents, and distinguish between the two (2) concepts. Discuss whether these doctrines are persuasive authority or binding authority. Provide two (2) examples of the concepts in use to support your rationale.
Stare Decisis is a Latin term meaning, “to stand by things decided”. This term is typically used in common law systems to express a notion that prior court decisions must be recognized as precedent. Precedent is defined as an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances. Binding authority entitles legal superiority over any conflicting state law or constitutional provision. An example of binding authority would be cases, statutes, regulations, and executive orders. Persuasive authority is a source of law, such as related cases or legal encyclopedias, that the court consults in deciding a case, but do not need to apply in reaching its conclusion. As an example, the interpretations of federal laws by the federal courts of appeals and district courts within the same jurisdictions, in situations where the state courts are interpreting federal law. That is, if a state court is hearing a case in which a federal claim is a part of a larger state claim, the state court will generally consider itself bound by the decisions of the U.S. district court of that state and the corresponding federal court of appeal on the federal matter.
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]