Comment:
The scope of the work to be done:
Title, abstract and all sections reword/rephrase
Include more reviews and results
Detailed methodology
Similarity value: <= 40%
1000 words to be added.
Comment:
Write a critical review as if you served as a manuscript referee for the journal. In the review, focus on the following points: (1) Significance to the field of mass spectrometry or science in general (2) Adequacy of experimental or theoretical approach (3) Logic (are there any errors, jumps, stretches, etc.) (4) Data quality and presentation (5) Literature references (whether or not adequate) (6) Paper length (whether commensurable with significance) Start the review with briefly summarizing the main positive aspects of the paper. Most importantly, your review should provide a qualified, detailed, and justified critique to help the authors improve the paper and also indicate to the Editor what should be the course and extent of revision. No paper is perfect (not even those already published!) Suggest additional experiments and/or interpretations that might elucidate unclear points or vague conclusions. Also point out if the paper had missed relevant references that were available at the time of submission. To write a qualified review, you will have to read several other papers related to the one under review. The absolute minimum is the references cited in the paper under review that should be used as primary leads to further literature. SciFinder will help you with getting more info on the area of research addressed in the paper under review. Link to groups final revised paper with reference links: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.3788/full
Comment:
please follow the pattern of lit review given in the images attached to this email. I would appreciate if this work is given to a scholar who has worked with education field and competent in writing the lit review. please also forward my previous work done by your writer so that the present writer can relate while answering how this literature review is relevant to my study.
I am also attaching the exact requirements from the professor below,
choose two of the studies in your lit review, and write about 200 words on each, saying
what they are about (and remember the context is important)
what the key arguments of the author(s) are,
what evidence they are based on,
what conclusions or recommendations there are
what relevance they may have for your study.
Cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder
Hand washing/vs alcohol based hand solutions to prevent infection transmission
Comment:
Identify two scholarly databases that will help you find the best research articles to support your EBP proposal. Please use the following databases: CINAHL Complete & Joanna Briggs Institute EBP. Discuss why these two databases are better than Google Scholar or a general Internet search.
Comment:
Instructions
In Week 5, you submitted your topic and paper outline for your Signature Assignment. Now, it is time to put it all together. The purpose of the Controversial Issues in Forensic Psychology paper is to describe a controversy or debate in forensic psychology, including the legal and psychological significance. An example of a controversy in forensic psychology would be, Should a child be able to testify as an eye witness? or Should incompetent defendants be committed indefinitely? Your paper should address the following:
Identify the relevant research on each side of the controversy.
Evaluate and reflect on the findings.
Identify a personal, educated stance on the topic, and then support it with relevant research.
Discuss the legal and psychological significance.
The Controversial Issues in Forensic Psychology paper requires considerable research and critical thinking. You should not base the majority of your paper on personal opinion. Your arguments should be based on data, expert opinion, and other peer-reviewed sources.
Support your analysis with at least five peer-reviewed references. Remember to incorporate your professors feedback into your final paper.
Length: 10-12 pages
Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the text, supplemental sources, and sources you find that are relevant to the topic. Your response should reflect graduate-level writing and APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University\’s Academic Integrity Policy.
PLEASE make sure the papers have reference pages!(: dr. wright is a stickler
Comment:
Dear Professional Research Paper writers (Stephanie Sackett), I need a research paper proposal on the following topic: Confederate Flag and Monuments,History,Significance,Controversy,Dillemas(Moral&Ethical),Representation,Future. Recently, in the last few days there has been a lot of media and news coverage regarding the confederate flag and monuments. Some news outlets discussing the removal and or some the keeping of the confederate flag and monuments. I like to have a research proposal with that topic and if approved I plan to have a minimum over 100 page research paper so I would need to make sure the research paper adequately addresses enough information and or topics for discussion and research if approved. I have attached to this form in text format the research proposal guidelines and criteria of the evaluators to help get approval for this research proposal.
After reading Chapter 4 of the Mosher textbook, what are some of the differences in using official crime data as discussed in Chapter 3 of the Mosher textbook and Self-Reported Data in Chapter 4? What are the particular strengths and weakness of each of these types of data sources?
Topic: Using Official Crime Data
After reading Chapter 3 of the Mosher textbook, \”An Arresting Experiment: Domestic Violence Victim and Perceptions\” by Miller, and \”Controlling a Jail Population by Partially Closing the Front Door\” by Baumer and Adams, discuss the following prompts:
How important is it to use official crime data?
What are some issues with using official crime data?
What public policy changes could be made by relying upon the 2 articles?