Did the piece hold your interest?

The source is a novel called “Ceremony” by Leslie Marmon Silko.
I want you to write your reaction/response to the combination of Poetry and Prose and the descriptive language that the Author used in her novel.
-Show that you understand what the author does well and what he or she does not do so well.
-did the piece hold your interest? Why or why not?
• did the piece bother or annoy you? why or why not?
• what would you ask, or tell, the author of the piece if you could?
• what did you realize as a result of reading the piece?
• what questions does the piece raise for you — about the material, about other things?
What do you feel/think about her writing style ?
Comments from Support Team:

What types of sources do you find claiming that childhood vaccinations are dangerous?

:
Quite a bit has been written online over the past decade about possible health risks of childhood vaccinations. This message has moved some parents to avoid having their children vaccinated. To introduce this discussion topic I would like you to listen to this recent episode of the Diane Rehm show from National Public Radio on childhood vaccination. Link: http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2014-07-03/ongoing-efforts-vaccinate-children-against-polio-measles-and-other-deadly-diseases
It is an hour-long show, so be sure to carve out the time to listen. Then use online resources to investigate the following questions:

What is the argument against childhood vaccinations?
What types of sources do you find claiming that childhood vaccinations are dangerous? Do you consider these to be quality science sources? Why or why not?
What does science have to say about this question? Is there good data to show whether children benefit or suffer from vaccination? What are good sources for this information?
The HPV vaccine is relatively recent and is recommended by the Centers for Disease control Link: http://www.cdc.gov/hpv/vaccine.html. all girls and boys at age 11 or 12 to prevent cervical and penile cancer. There has been some debate at the state level whether HPV vaccine should be recommended for children. Look into this question

What is the argument against childhood vaccinations?

: 0
Paper details:
Quite a bit has been written online over the past decade about possible health risks of childhood vaccinations. This message has moved some parents to avoid having their children vaccinated. To introduce this discussion topic I would like you to listen to this recent episode of the Diane Rehm show from National Public Radio on childhood vaccination. Link: http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2014-07-03/ongoing-efforts-vaccinate-children-against-polio-measles-and-other-deadly-diseases
It is an hour-long show, so be sure to carve out the time to listen. Then use online resources to investigate the following questions:

What is the argument against childhood vaccinations?
What types of sources do you find claiming that childhood vaccinations are dangerous? Do you consider these to be quality science sources? Why or why not?
What does science have to say about this question? Is there good data to show whether children benefit or suffer from vaccination? What are good sources for this information?
The HPV vaccine is relatively recent and is recommended by the Centers for Disease control Link: http://www.cdc.gov/hpv/vaccine.html. all girls and boys at age 11 or 12 to prevent cervical and penile cancer. There has been some debate at the state level whether HPV vaccine should be recommended for children. Look into this question and be prepared to discuss the risks and benefits of this vaccine.

If you had one more chance to make a revision to that project, what would you revise?

1) Describe a situation or element of your first, second, third, or forth project that failed or went wrong. Then, tell me how you fixed or recover from the failure.
2) Pick one of your projects and describe this: If you had one more chance to make a revision to that project, what would you revise? Think beyond “I’d make the grammar and spelling better.” Think big. See big.
————————–
EACH QUESTION IN A PAGE PLEASE
Comments from Support Team:
Fee: $12

Describe a situation or element of your first, second, third, or forth project that failed or went wrong.

:
1) Describe a situation or element of your first, second, third, or forth project that failed or went wrong. Then, tell me how you fixed or recover from the failure.
2) Pick one of your projects and describe this: If you had one more chance to make a revision to that project, what would you revise? Think beyond “I’d make the grammar and spelling better.” Think big. See big.
————————–
EACH QUESTION IN A PAGE PLEASE
Comments from Support Team:

What evidence do you have of enterprise and employability skills developed to date and how do you think you may use any skills developed in a role in the future?

: 0
Paper details:
I want you to please check my work and add references. It is a Personal Reflection report and business performance, I was in a group and we had to come up with a business idea. First, we came up with smoothies and cupcakes but then we were not allowed to sell homemade food/drinks due to safety. The attachment explains everything in detail.
Here are some points that will help also:

– Need to be 1500 words
– Account for the ventures success or otherwise by considering how it performed against your business plan?
– Reflect on your personal contribution to the decision making and actions used to develop the business in your role that you adopted in the business?
– What would your team need to do differently in the future to improve business performance?
better planning and more research on what we are doing before starting, for example we decided to do the smoothies before planing and ask the union if we are allowed to do homemade stuff.
– What evidence do you have of enterprise and employability skills developed to date and how do you think you may use any skills developed in a role in the future?
– Mention the belbin test
– 10 – 15 references

What would your team need to do differently in the future to improve business performance?

I want you to please check my work and add references. It is a Personal Reflection report and business performance, I was in a group and we had to come up with a business idea. First, we came up with smoothies and cupcakes but then we were not allowed to sell homemade food/drinks due to safety. The attachment explains everything in detail.
Here are some points that will help also:

– Need to be 1500 words
– Account for the ventures success or otherwise by considering how it performed against your business plan?
– Reflect on your personal contribution to the decision making and actions used to develop the business in your role that you adopted in the business?
– What would your team need to do differently in the future to improve business performance?
better planning and more research on what we are doing before starting, for example we decided to do the smoothies before planing and ask the union if we are allowed to do homemade stuff.
– What evidence do you have of enterprise and employability skills developed to date and how do you think you may use any skills developed in a role in the future?
– Mention the belbin test
– 10 – 15

What you think of it (Did your research confirm or disprove your theory?

:
First watch the movie called Tsotsi, directed by Gavin Hood 2005.
1.How do you feel about what you see?
2. What do you agree or disagree with?
3.Can you identify with the situation?
4.What would be the best way to evaluate the story?
5.What you think of it (Tip: You have to have a theory about what the work means to provide focus for your research and analysis. You don’t have to say everything possible about the work: be guided by what interests you most, which might change as you do research. Be prepared to wander and explore a bit).
6. What the thing is
7. What its parts are (words, punctuation, literary techniques or devices)
8. What those parts are used for and how they’re put together (structure, patterns, and themes)
9. Who made it, and the influence of that person’s beliefs and ideology on his/her work (Tip: Don’t guess, assume, or psychoanalyze.)
10. Where and when it was made, and the interplay of that context and the thing itself
11. Who its original audience might have been and what they thought of it
12. What you think of it (Did your research confirm or disprove your theory? Now what do you think the work means? Who cares?)
Comments from Support Team:

What would be the best way to evaluate the story?

:
First watch the movie called Tsotsi, directed by Gavin Hood 2005.
1.How do you feel about what you see?
2. What do you agree or disagree with?
3.Can you identify with the situation?
4.What would be the best way to evaluate the story?
5.What you think of it (Tip: You have to have a theory about what the work means to provide focus for your research and analysis. You don’t have to say everything possible about the work: be guided by what interests you most, which might change as you do research. Be prepared to wander and explore a bit).
6. What the thing is
7. What its parts are (words, punctuation, literary techniques or devices)
8. What those parts are used for and how they’re put together (structure, patterns, and themes)
9. Who made it, and the influence of that person’s beliefs and ideology on his/her work (Tip: Don’t guess, assume, or psychoanalyze.)
10. Where and when it was made, and the interplay of that context and the thing itself
11. Who its original audience might have been and what they thought of it
12. What you think of it (Did your research confirm or disprove your theory? Now what do you think the work means? Who cares?)
Comments from Support Team:
Fee: $11

Can you identify with the situation?

:
First watch the movie called Tsotsi, directed by Gavin Hood 2005.
1.How do you feel about what you see?
2. What do you agree or disagree with?
3.Can you identify with the situation?
4.What would be the best way to evaluate the story?
5.What you think of it (Tip: You have to have a theory about what the work means to provide focus for your research and analysis. You don’t have to say everything possible about the work: be guided by what interests you most, which might change as you do research. Be prepared to wander and explore a bit).
6. What the thing is
7. What its parts are (words, punctuation, literary techniques or devices)
8. What those parts are used for and how they’re put together (structure, patterns, and themes)
9. Who made it, and the influence of that person’s beliefs and ideology on his/her work (Tip: Don’t guess, assume, or psychoanalyze.)
10. Where and when it was made, and the interplay of that context and the thing itself
11. Who its original audience might have been and what they thought of it
12. What you think of it (Did your research confirm or disprove your theory? Now what do you think the work means? Who cares?)
Comments from Support Team: