My assessment involves creating a 50 minutes seminar lesson plan for ONE session (I will provide a sample for a different subject) aimed for an undergraduate year 2 mathematics students (The topic of that session can be anything related to what a second year undergraduate student would be taught e.g.. Complex analysis, Numerical methods etc).
Following this, I need to write a 2000 word piece which demonstrates consideration of the activities within the plan accompanied by appropriate rationale for their implementation. This aspect of the work must draw on relevant theory and literature, and demonstrate an appropriate level of criticality and analysis.
Assessment Criteria:
-Explain and justify the focus of your teaching plan with reference to your previous, current or future practice (10%)
-Comprehensive lesson plan clearly outlined (10%)
-Consideration of appropriate activities within your plan with rationale for their implementation (30%).
-Critical discussion throughout with appropriate application of theory/literature (30%).
-Clear, concise and logical development of the work with accurate referencing using a recognised referencing system (10%)
-Completion of a self assessment with marks and comments provided (10%)
Lastly, for the self-assessment criteria, I will attach a document that has to be completed,
to fulfil the last criteria. That is to consider how well you believe you have met each assessment criterion, and what mark you would give yourself for each. Also you should comment on what you have been able to do well and discuss whether there are areas you could develop further.
TO THE WRITER:
I THINK IT ALSO WORTHS MENTIONING THAT I HAD NO EXPERIENCE OF TEACHING A SEMINAR (ROUGHLY 20/30 STUDENTS).
PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
Introduction
In the Canadian history, there has been a long debate and a lack of consensus on the legal status of cannabis. Since 1997, public opinion polls have found an increasing percentage of citizens believe “smoking marijuana should not be a criminal offence”. The newly elected liberal party of Canada addressed the issue with cannabis by stating “We will legalize, regulate, and restrict access to marijuana.” The Liberal Party removed the marijuana consumption and incidental possession from the Criminal Code. They promised to create stronger laws and focus on punishing more severely on those who provide marijuana to minors or sell it outside the new regulatory framework. New and appropriate federal and provincial excise taxes will also be applied on Marijuana. This is a huge leap from Canada’s traditional law of strictly prohibiting marijuana. The Liberal Party will face many obstacles when implementing this policy. In this paper, I will use normative and positive analysis to access the government intervention on legalizing marijuana. I will compare the new policy with the old one for fairness and effectiveness. I will also look into how the two policy affect different key stakeholders like special interest parties and consumers. Recommendation will be given after the analysis to either mitigate implementation risk or adjust policy.
Government Intervention
Normative Analysis
The Liberal Party believes Canada’s previous prohibition of marijuana did not prevent young people from using it, instead, it puts too many young Canadians into the criminal justice
system for minor offences. At the same time, it increased the cost of prosecuting those petty crimes. A normative comparison of the new policy with traditional policy will be made to access effectives. What should the government do to act in best interested of society. Under the traditional law, prohibit marijuana has led to a market failure. Some ineffectiveness comes from consuming marijuana led to impaired driving and car accidents and a large illegal market for selling marijuana. How much taxes has it gained and how much has it spend on prosecuting illegal marijuana’s? The new law aims to legalize and collect taxes on exercising marijuana, will that be sufficient to correct the negative externality? Will the taxes be low enough to turn people away from black markets? How will the pot industry change under the new relaxing policy? Another comparisons will be made for the fairness of the two policy. The tradition law punishes almost everyone who comes into contact with marijuana while the new law puts more focus on the ones that sell marijuana to the minors. By putting myself in different key stakeholders point of view, I will evaluate which one is for fair for young Canadians, marijuana consumers, sellers and the society. Colorado is one of the four cities in the United States that legalized marijuana. A brief comparison of Liberal’s policy and Colorado’s will be made to gather the effectiveness and fairness in an international standpoint.
Positive Analysis
It seems a majority of Canadians believe the government should relax the cannabis regulation. This section will focus on the public opinion poll to see what the government ought to do when dealing with marijuana. Legalized marijuana could change Canadian cities in different ways for the province has a say in determine how much tax they choose to exercise. Will the
new law be favored by majority of Canadians or will it cause public outrage.
This section will also discuss to what extent does the lobbyists have affected the liberal government’s decision. Bloc Pot, a Quebec pro-marijuana party also a major contributor to the Liberal Party, has seen their dreams of legalizing marijuana coming true. What are the strengths and weakness of this party and how will they benefit the society will be discussed in greater detail. There are also parties who strongly oppose to normalize marijuana. The Canadian chapter of Smart Approach to Marijuana is looking to push back on the pro-marijuana crowd. A detailed reasoning and their strengths and weakness will also be discussed in greater detail in this paper.
Recommendation
After the two analysis, I will gain a better understanding of whether legalizing marijuana will have more benefit or costs on society. If greater benefits are added to society, I will give out recommendations to the Liberal party on how to mitigate public outrage on those who are opposing to the law. If the analysis favors the traditional law, I will give out recommendations on what specific measures the Liberal Party can input on marijuana to exercise a stricter law.
Introduction
In the Canadian history, there has been a long debate and a lack of consensus on the legal status of cannabis. Since 1997, public opinion polls have found an increasing percentage of citizens believe “smoking marijuana should not be a criminal offence”. The newly elected liberal party of Canada addressed the issue with cannabis by stating “We will legalize, regulate, and restrict access to marijuana.” The Liberal Party removed the marijuana consumption and incidental possession from the Criminal Code. They promised to create stronger laws and focus on punishing more severely on those who provide marijuana to minors or sell it outside the new regulatory framework. New and appropriate federal and provincial excise taxes will also be applied on Marijuana. This is a huge leap from Canada’s traditional law of strictly prohibiting marijuana. The Liberal Party will face many obstacles when implementing this policy. In this paper, I will use normative and positive analysis to access the government intervention on legalizing marijuana. I will compare the new policy with the old one for fairness and effectiveness. I will also look into how the two policy affect different key stakeholders like special interest parties and consumers. Recommendation will be given after the analysis to either mitigate implementation risk or adjust policy.
Government Intervention
Normative Analysis
The Liberal Party believes Canada’s previous prohibition of marijuana did not prevent young people from using it, instead, it puts too many young Canadians into the criminal justice
system for minor offences. At the same time, it increased the cost of prosecuting those petty crimes. A normative comparison of the new policy with traditional policy will be made to access effectives. What should the government do to act in best interested of society. Under the traditional law, prohibit marijuana has led to a market failure. Some ineffectiveness comes from consuming marijuana led to impaired driving and car accidents and a large illegal market for selling marijuana. How much taxes has it gained and how much has it spend on prosecuting illegal marijuana’s? The new law aims to legalize and collect taxes on exercising marijuana, will that be sufficient to correct the negative externality? Will the taxes be low enough to turn people away from black markets? How will the pot industry change under the new relaxing policy? Another comparisons will be made for the fairness of the two policy. The tradition law punishes almost everyone who comes into contact with marijuana while the new law puts more focus on the ones that sell marijuana to the minors. By putting myself in different key stakeholders point of view, I will evaluate which one is for fair for young Canadians, marijuana consumers, sellers and the society. Colorado is one of the four cities in the United States that legalized marijuana. A brief comparison of Liberal’s policy and Colorado’s will be made to gather the effectiveness and fairness in an international standpoint.
Positive Analysis
It seems a majority of Canadians believe the government should relax the cannabis regulation. This section will focus on the public opinion poll to see what the government ought to do when dealing with marijuana. Legalized marijuana could change Canadian cities in different ways for the province has a say in determine how much tax they choose to exercise. Will the
new law be favored by majority of Canadians or will it cause public outrage.
This section will also discuss to what extent does the lobbyists have affected the liberal government’s decision. Bloc Pot, a Quebec pro-marijuana party also a major contributor to the Liberal Party, has seen their dreams of legalizing marijuana coming true. What are the strengths and weakness of this party and how will they benefit the society will be discussed in greater detail. There are also parties who strongly oppose to normalize marijuana. The Canadian chapter of Smart Approach to Marijuana is looking to push back on the pro-marijuana crowd. A detailed reasoning and their strengths and weakness will also be discussed in greater detail in this paper.
Recommendation
After the two analysis, I will gain a better understanding of whether legalizing marijuana will have more benefit or costs on society. If greater benefits are added to society, I will give out recommendations to the Liberal party on how to mitigate public outrage on those who are opposing to the law. If the analysis favors the traditional law, I will give out recommendations on what specific measures the Liberal Party can input on marijuana to exercise a stricter law.
Introduction
In the Canadian history, there has been a long debate and a lack of consensus on the legal status of cannabis. Since 1997, public opinion polls have found an increasing percentage of citizens believe “smoking marijuana should not be a criminal offence”. The newly elected liberal party of Canada addressed the issue with cannabis by stating “We will legalize, regulate, and restrict access to marijuana.” The Liberal Party removed the marijuana consumption and incidental possession from the Criminal Code. They promised to create stronger laws and focus on punishing more severely on those who provide marijuana to minors or sell it outside the new regulatory framework. New and appropriate federal and provincial excise taxes will also be applied on Marijuana. This is a huge leap from Canada’s traditional law of strictly prohibiting marijuana. The Liberal Party will face many obstacles when implementing this policy. In this paper, I will use normative and positive analysis to access the government intervention on legalizing marijuana. I will compare the new policy with the old one for fairness and effectiveness. I will also look into how the two policy affect different key stakeholders like special interest parties and consumers. Recommendation will be given after the analysis to either mitigate implementation risk or adjust policy.
Government Intervention
Normative Analysis
The Liberal Party believes Canada’s previous prohibition of marijuana did not prevent young people from using it, instead, it puts too many young Canadians into the criminal justice
system for minor offences. At the same time, it increased the cost of prosecuting those petty crimes. A normative comparison of the new policy with traditional policy will be made to access effectives. What should the government do to act in best interested of society. Under the traditional law, prohibit marijuana has led to a market failure. Some ineffectiveness comes from consuming marijuana led to impaired driving and car accidents and a large illegal market for selling marijuana. How much taxes has it gained and how much has it spend on prosecuting illegal marijuana’s? The new law aims to legalize and collect taxes on exercising marijuana, will that be sufficient to correct the negative externality? Will the taxes be low enough to turn people away from black markets? How will the pot industry change under the new relaxing policy? Another comparisons will be made for the fairness of the two policy. The tradition law punishes almost everyone who comes into contact with marijuana while the new law puts more focus on the ones that sell marijuana to the minors. By putting myself in different key stakeholders point of view, I will evaluate which one is for fair for young Canadians, marijuana consumers, sellers and the society. Colorado is one of the four cities in the United States that legalized marijuana. A brief comparison of Liberal’s policy and Colorado’s will be made to gather the effectiveness and fairness in an international standpoint.
Positive Analysis
It seems a majority of Canadians believe the government should relax the cannabis regulation. This section will focus on the public opinion poll to see what the government ought to do when dealing with marijuana. Legalized marijuana could change Canadian cities in different ways for the province has a say in determine how much tax they choose to exercise. Will the
new law be favored by majority of Canadians or will it cause public outrage.
This section will also discuss to what extent does the lobbyists have affected the liberal government’s decision. Bloc Pot, a Quebec pro-marijuana party also a major contributor to the Liberal Party, has seen their dreams of legalizing marijuana coming true. What are the strengths and weakness of this party and how will they benefit the society will be discussed in greater detail. There are also parties who strongly oppose to normalize marijuana. The Canadian chapter of Smart Approach to Marijuana is looking to push back on the pro-marijuana crowd. A detailed reasoning and their strengths and weakness will also be discussed in greater detail in this paper.
Recommendation
After the two analysis, I will gain a better understanding of whether legalizing marijuana will have more benefit or costs on society. If greater benefits are added to society, I will give out recommendations to the Liberal party on how to mitigate public outrage on those who are opposing to the law. If the analysis favors the traditional law, I will give out recommendations on what specific measures the Liberal Party can input on marijuana to exercise a stricter law.
Introduction
In the Canadian history, there has been a long debate and a lack of consensus on the legal status of cannabis. Since 1997, public opinion polls have found an increasing percentage of citizens believe “smoking marijuana should not be a criminal offence”. The newly elected liberal party of Canada addressed the issue with cannabis by stating “We will legalize, regulate, and restrict access to marijuana.” The Liberal Party removed the marijuana consumption and incidental possession from the Criminal Code. They promised to create stronger laws and focus on punishing more severely on those who provide marijuana to minors or sell it outside the new regulatory framework. New and appropriate federal and provincial excise taxes will also be applied on Marijuana. This is a huge leap from Canada’s traditional law of strictly prohibiting marijuana. The Liberal Party will face many obstacles when implementing this policy. In this paper, I will use normative and positive analysis to access the government intervention on legalizing marijuana. I will compare the new policy with the old one for fairness and effectiveness. I will also look into how the two policy affect different key stakeholders like special interest parties and consumers. Recommendation will be given after the analysis to either mitigate implementation risk or adjust policy.
Government Intervention
Normative Analysis
The Liberal Party believes Canada’s previous prohibition of marijuana did not prevent young people from using it, instead, it puts too many young Canadians into the criminal justice
system for minor offences. At the same time, it increased the cost of prosecuting those petty crimes. A normative comparison of the new policy with traditional policy will be made to access effectives. What should the government do to act in best interested of society. Under the traditional law, prohibit marijuana has led to a market failure. Some ineffectiveness comes from consuming marijuana led to impaired driving and car accidents and a large illegal market for selling marijuana. How much taxes has it gained and how much has it spend on prosecuting illegal marijuana’s? The new law aims to legalize and collect taxes on exercising marijuana, will that be sufficient to correct the negative externality? Will the taxes be low enough to turn people away from black markets? How will the pot industry change under the new relaxing policy? Another comparisons will be made for the fairness of the two policy. The tradition law punishes almost everyone who comes into contact with marijuana while the new law puts more focus on the ones that sell marijuana to the minors. By putting myself in different key stakeholders point of view, I will evaluate which one is for fair for young Canadians, marijuana consumers, sellers and the society. Colorado is one of the four cities in the United States that legalized marijuana. A brief comparison of Liberal’s policy and Colorado’s will be made to gather the effectiveness and fairness in an international standpoint.
Positive Analysis
It seems a majority of Canadians believe the government should relax the cannabis regulation. This section will focus on the public opinion poll to see what the government ought to do when dealing with marijuana. Legalized marijuana could change Canadian cities in different ways for the province has a say in determine how much tax they choose to exercise. Will the
new law be favored by majority of Canadians or will it cause public outrage.
This section will also discuss to what extent does the lobbyists have affected the liberal government’s decision. Bloc Pot, a Quebec pro-marijuana party also a major contributor to the Liberal Party, has seen their dreams of legalizing marijuana coming true. What are the strengths and weakness of this party and how will they benefit the society will be discussed in greater detail. There are also parties who strongly oppose to normalize marijuana. The Canadian chapter of Smart Approach to Marijuana is looking to push back on the pro-marijuana crowd. A detailed reasoning and their strengths and weakness will also be discussed in greater detail in this paper.
Recommendation
After the two analysis, I will gain a better understanding of whether legalizing marijuana will have more benefit or costs on society. If greater benefits are added to society, I will give out recommendations to the Liberal party on how to mitigate public outrage on those who are opposing to the law. If the analysis favors the traditional law, I will give out recommendations on what specific measures the Liberal Party can input on marijuana to exercise a stricter law.
Unit IV Mini Project
Write a report discussing the sampling design for the proposal.
Describe the sampling procedures (convenience, quota, simple random) that will yield the best results for your research objective and justify your rationale for choosing the procedure(s). Include the following information:
1. Research the objective.
2. Description of the population: Process for identifying the target population and selecting the sampling frame.
3. Identify the different types of biases that are likely to occur, and explain what steps you will take to minimize them.
4. Conclusion: Highlight the major points discussed in the previous sections. Be sure to relate the information back to the purpose and relevance of the research.
You must use correct APA formatting when writing your paper. All references used, including the textbook, must be cited.
Please follow the subject done by orders numbers# Unit I 81543635 and Unit II 81543635.
Unit IV Mini Project
Write a report discussing the sampling design for the proposal.
Describe the sampling procedures that will yield the best results for your research objective and justify your rationale for choosing the procedure(s). Include the following information:
1. Research the objective.
2. Description of the population: Process for identifying the target population and selecting the sampling frame.
3. Identify the different types of biases that are likely to occur, and explain what steps you will take to minimize them.
4. Conclusion: Highlight the major points discussed in the previous sections. Be sure to relate the information back to the purpose and relevance of the research.
You must use correct APA formatting when writing your paper. All references used, including the textbook, must be cited.
Please follow the subject done by orders numbers# Unit I 81543635 and Unit II 81543635.