Author: chris

Could some information be presented more clearly in a table/figure/graph?

<br>
4000-word Quantitative Research Proposal<br>
NB: submission deadline is 16 December 2015<br>
Programme of study: MA in Disability Studies (School of Policy and Social Sciences)<br>
Module/Unit: Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences. <br>
The assignment for this unit requires you to develop a quantitative research proposal. We would like you to design a study in a policy area of your choice.<br>
<br>
The study could be a: <br>
• Observational survey <br>
• Experimental trial <br>
• Secondary analysis of existing observational or experimental data <br>
• Systematic review.<br>
<br>
Part One (no more than 2000 words) <br>
In the first part of the assignment we would like you to describe a study you have designed to answer a research question in a policy area of your choice. The proposal should contain a clear outline of the:<br>
<br>
• Theoretical background to the area that you wish to explore <br>
• Research question/s that will be answered <br>
• Hypotheses that will be tested – highlighting the independent and dependent variables <br>
• Methods to be used including detail on o Study design <br>
o Sampling frame <br>
o Data collection/Access procedures <br>
o Data Analysis plan (Using Statistical Package for Social sciences-SPSS)<br>
.Anticipated ethical issues in the study,<br>
.Preliminary studies or pilot tests <br>
.Significance of the study<br>
<br>
Part Two (no more than 2000 words) <br>
The second part of the assignment should draw on methodological literature and analyse the strengths and weakness of the proposed research and methods. Your analysis should consider:<br>
. The philosophycal underpinnings <br>
• The strengths and weaknesses of the design/methods selected <br>
• Practical difficulties in conducting the research <br>
• Threats to validity (internal, external, construct etc validity) &amp; reliability and steps taken to control for them. <br>
• Ethical issues raised by the proposal<br>
. Conclusions<br>
<br>
Guidance <br>
• Your essay should use <a href=”https://1.5″ target=”_blank”>1.5</a> line spacing; no less than 12 pt font <br>
• Include exact word count – <br>
• The main section including parts one and two (no more than 4000 words, including figures and tables but not reference lists) <br>
• A complete reference list presented according to the Harvard system1. <br>
• Include page numbers at the bottom of each page <br>
• Remember that you may lose marks if you exceed the word limit, do not reference properly, or submit the assignment late without a pre-approved extension.<br>
<br>
Marking: <br>
Briefly assignments should demonstrate:<br>
• Knowledge of the relevant literature <br>
• Independent and critical evidence synthesis <br>
• An acquisition relevant skills <br>
• Clear presentation and use of referencing system <br>
• The ability to write well and draw valid conclusions <br>
<br>
Tips: To check the quality of your essay, consider asking yourself the following questions and noting in the margins of your final draft where you have addressed each point. <br>
<br>
Purpose and Objectives:<br>
• Is the main purpose clear? In your words, what is it? <br>
• Are objectives stated early on and major issues clearly identified? Are they linked in obvious ways to the main research question? <br>
• Will the reader quickly see how the question relates to the area of interest? <br>
• Are the style and tone of the essay appropriate to the audience and the occasion?<br>
<br>
Structure:<br>
• Are subsections and paragraphs unified – each focusing on one central topic? <br>
• Does your format (headings, bullets, boldface, etc) explicitly describe the text that follows? Do headings summarise key points? <br>
• Are there clear ‘road signs’ indicating how your arguments move towards your conclusions? <br>
• Are there any redundant/repetitive parts? Can they be combined or deleted? <br>
<br>
Development:<br>
• Do you indicate awareness of the difference between facts and opinions?<br>
• Are opinions sufficiently supported by relevant data/sources/theory? <br>
• Are issues overdeveloped; too detailed or contain less relevant arguments?<br>
• Could some information be presented more clearly in a table/figure/graph?<br>
NB: submission deadline is 16 December 2015

How does this type of situation contribute to the tension between cost and care?

write your analysis and assessment of the ethical and economic challenges related to policy decisions such as those presented in the Washington Post article. How does this type of situation contribute to the tension between cost and care? Substantiate your response with at least two outside resources.
Plz refer this site and write
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/07/AR2010110705205.html
•Stein, R. (2010, November 8). Review of prostate cancer drugs Provenge renews medical cost-benefit debate. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/07/AR2010110705205.html

Based on your research of the law and the GE and ESPN cases, was the case of David Letterman’s sexual misconduct matter in 2009 a form of harassment or discrimination?

PLEASE DONT SUMMARIZE THE CASE IN MY PAPER. FOCUS ON THE QUESTIONS BELOW AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS FROM THE CASE STUDY. ALSO, READ THE ORDER DESCRIPTION CAREFULLY. IF YOU DONT READ THE DESCRIPTION THOROUGHLY THEN YOU WONT BE ABLE TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT.

Research the legal definitions for sexual harassment and discrimination. What is the importance of legal definitions in cases/crises of this nature, and how do you believe these definitions frame public perception?

Also, please research the Lorene Schaefer General Electric discrimination case from the summer of 2005 and the ESPN sexual harassment case involving Harold Reynolds in 2006, paying particular attention to the messaging by the organizations and individuals involved. Think about the importance of company policies and practices during such a crisis.

Based on your research of the law and the GE and ESPN cases, was the case of David Letterman’s sexual misconduct matter in 2009 a form of harassment or discrimination? If you were the network or television production company, what statement would you issue? Also prepare a model Q&A (Questions and Answers) that incorporates bridging techniques back to your key message points.

If you were the network or television production company, what statement would you issue?

PLEASE DONT SUMMARIZE THE CASE IN MY PAPER. FOCUS ON THE QUESTIONS BELOW AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS FROM THE CASE STUDY. ALSO, READ THE ORDER DESCRIPTION CAREFULLY. IF YOU DONT READ THE DESCRIPTION THOROUGHLY THEN YOU WONT BE ABLE TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT.

Research the legal definitions for sexual harassment and discrimination. What is the importance of legal definitions in cases/crises of this nature, and how do you believe these definitions frame public perception?

Also, please research the Lorene Schaefer General Electric discrimination case from the summer of 2005 and the ESPN sexual harassment case involving Harold Reynolds in 2006, paying particular attention to the messaging by the organizations and individuals involved. Think about the importance of company policies and practices during such a crisis.

Based on your research of the law and the GE and ESPN cases, was the case of David Letterman’s sexual misconduct matter in 2009 a form of harassment or discrimination? If you were the network or television production company, what statement would you issue? Also prepare a model Q&A (Questions and Answers) that incorporates bridging techniques back to your key message points.

What is the importance of legal definitions in casesand how do you believe these definitions frame public perception?

PLEASE DONT SUMMARIZE THE CASE IN MY PAPER. FOCUS ON THE QUESTIONS BELOW AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS FROM THE CASE STUDY. ALSO, READ THE ORDER DESCRIPTION CAREFULLY. IF YOU DONT READ THE DESCRIPTION THOROUGHLY THEN YOU WONT BE ABLE TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT.

Research the legal definitions for sexual harassment and discrimination. What is the importance of legal definitions in casesand how do you believe these definitions frame public perception?

Also, please research the Lorene Schaefer General Electric discrimination case from the summer of 2005 and the ESPN sexual harassment case involving Harold Reynolds in 2006, paying particular attention to the messaging by the organizations and individuals involved. Think about the importance of company policies and practices during such a crisis.

Based on your research of the law and the GE and ESPN cases, was the case of David Letterman’s sexual misconduct matter in 2009 a form of harassment or discrimination? If you were the network or television production company, what statement would you issue? Also prepare a model Q&A (Questions and Answers) that incorporates bridging techniques back to your key message points.

Explain why the design feature of the product is important to users or humans in terms of user performance and satisfaction.

Order code: 81563470

t
Not available

Request order

Close
By accepting this order you agree to our Terms and conditions and confirm to complete it by the deadline following all the requirements.

Time remaining: 3 days 17 hours 36 minutes
Deadline: December 11 14:47
Order total: $13.65
Compensation
$4.55 / Page
Pages: 3, Double spaced
Sources: 1
Order type: Case Study
Subject: Engineering
Academic level: Undergraduate
Style: APA
Language: English (U.S.)

 


Place bid

 

Hide order

Order Description

Assignment instruction:
This assignment is to experimentally evaluate two different designs of a product, and analyze the data from the experiment.

1. Choose two existing designs (ergonomic designs) of a product (any product having its own functions) (chairs, computers, phones, calculators, staplers, mouse, keyboard, etc.). and identify one design feature for comparison (e.g. chair with/without lumbar support, 5cm/10cm thickness of lumbar support, pin/pattern recognition of smartphone, etc.) *Provide photos of two designs of the product you chose. Explain why the design feature of the product is important to users or humans in terms of user performance and satisfaction (Less than 100 words)
2. Conduct an experiment with two designs (Measure both performance and satisfaction. For satisfaction measure, you need to use a questionnaire). Include a typical task with the product. At least 5 subjects for each trial should be used. Describe, subjects, procedure, and methods. (Less than 150 words)
3. Provide statistical analysis (Mean, standard deviation, t-Test)
4. Discuss the results (Less than 200 words). Interpret the results, findings, and weakness.

you did this assignment for my friends please don’t do the same

Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

//

Request order
// // <![CDATA[
var order_id = 1563470;
function fixTimeZero(num)
{
if (num < 10)
{
return '0'+num;
}

return num;
}

function checkSubmit()
{
if ($('#deadline_reason option:selected').val() != 0)
{
$('#ext-deadline').show();
} else {
$('#ext-deadline').hide();
}
}

$(function() {
$( ".datepicker" ).datepicker({
showOn: "button",
buttonImage: "/res/img/wr/calendar.png",
buttonImageOnly: true,
dateFormat : 'dd/mm/yy',
maxDate: '+2m',
minDate: new Date(2015, 12 – 1, 11),
onSelect: function(dateText) {
$('#new_deadline').text(dateText.split('/')[0]+'/'+dateText.split('/')[1]+'/'+dateText.split('/')[2]);
}
});

$('.time_input').click(function(){
switch (true)
{
case $(this).hasClass('ti_hour_plus'):
$('#rd_hour').text(parseInt($('#rd_hour').text(), 10) 0 ? fixTimeZero(parseInt($(‘#rd_hour’).text(), 10) – 1) : $(‘#rd_hour’).text());
break;
case $(this).hasClass(‘ti_min_plus’):
$(‘#rd_minutes’).text(parseInt($(‘#rd_minutes’).text(), 10) 0 ? fixTimeZero(parseInt($(‘#rd_minutes’).text(), 10) – 1) : $(‘#rd_minutes’).text());
break;
}
})

$(‘#ext-deadline’).click(function(e){
e.preventDefault();
var new_deadline = $(‘#new_deadline’).text();

deadline = (new_deadline.split(‘/’)[2]).toString() + ‘-‘ +
(new_deadline.split(‘/’)[1]).toString() + ‘-‘ +
(new_deadline.split(‘/’)[0]).toString() + ‘ ‘ +
($(‘#rd_hour’).text()).toString() + ‘:’ +
($(‘#rd_minutes’).text()).toString() + ‘:00’;

reason_id = $(‘#deadline_reason option:selected’).val();

$.ajax({
url : ‘/sys/orders/view.extdeadline/’ + order_id,
data : {ext_deadline : deadline, reason_id : reason_id},
type : ‘post’,
dataType: ‘json’,
success : function(data){
$(‘.deadline_ext_error, .deadline_ext_msg’).empty();
if(data.result == 0) {
$(‘.deadline_ext_error’).html(data.message).show();;
} else {
$(‘.deadline_ext_msg’).html(data.message).show();
}
}
})
})
});
// ]]>

Request deadline extension till
Choose your reason

———–
Specific software needed
Extensive readings
Material research
Too close to deadline

Date
11/12/2015

...
Time
14
47

Submit

Identify all the relevant alternatives.

Your case analysis is to contain the following sections:
Section 1: Provide a general description of the country.
Section 2: Define the central issue of the case.
Section 3: Define the country’s goals.
Section 4: Identify the constraints of the problem.
Section 5: Identify all the relevant alternatives.
Section 6: Select the best alternative and provide a justification for the selection. Note: there is no right answer but it is about how you justify your selection based on international business theory.
Section 7: Develop an implementation plan.

Identify the constraints of the problem.

Your case analysis is to contain the following sections:
Section 1: Provide a general description of the country.
Section 2: Define the central issue of the case.
Section 3: Define the country’s goals.
Section 4: Identify the constraints of the problem.
Section 5: Identify all the relevant alternatives.
Section 6: Select the best alternative and provide a justification for the selection. Note: there is no right answer but it is about how you justify your selection based on international business theory.
Section 7: Develop an implementation plan.

Define the country’s goals.

Your case analysis is to contain the following sections:
Section 1: Provide a general description of the country.
Section 2: Define the central issue of the case.
Section 3: Define the country’s goals.
Section 4: Identify the constraints of the problem.
Section 5: Identify all the relevant alternatives.
Section 6: Select the best alternative and provide a justification for the selection. Note: there is no right answer but it is about how you justify your selection based on international business theory.
Section 7: Develop an implementation plan.

Define the central issue of the case.

Your case analysis is to contain the following sections:
Section 1: Provide a general description of the country.
Section 2: Define the central issue of the case.
Section 3: Define the country’s goals.
Section 4: Identify the constraints of the problem.
Section 5: Identify all the relevant alternatives.
Section 6: Select the best alternative and provide a justification for the selection. Note: there is no right answer but it is about how you justify your selection based on international business theory.
Section 7: Develop an implementation plan.