Author: chris

Unit VIII Essay (For hifsa shaukat Only) International Business

[Pin It]

Answer the following essay questions using a minimum of three sources for each response. Your paper should be at least three pages in length and use APA style guidelines.

You are CEO of ABC Washing Machine Company, and you want to market front load washers and dryers in the Czech Republic. Taking into consideration the mean income for this country is around 20,000 USD, how would you market front load washers/dryers? Your response should include:

 economic, legal, and political concerns;

 product differentiation and alteration strategies;

 marketing mix strategies (price, promotion, and place);

 explain each of the staffing approaches; and



Note: please include title page with running head, in-text citation, time roman, 12 font and reference. basically follow the APA format, thanks

In a well-written paper, answer the following about the case:

1. Describe the nature of the case. Describe the parties involved and provide a summary of the facts in the case.

2. Identify which of the antidiscrimination laws was violated in the case, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, ADEA, EPA, IRCA, ADA, or GINA.

3. Evaluate the seriousness and scope of the discrimination.

4. What could have been done to prevent the discriminatory practices in the first place? Provide specific action steps you would recommend.

5. Explain the relevant law in light of its historical context and why it was enacted. How does the law protect the offended workers in this case?

Paper Requirements:

Your paper should include an introduction and a conclusion and should be 3-4 pages long, not including the required title and reference pages.

Incorporate two scholarly references that are not required readings for this module.

In a well-written paper, answer the following about the case:

1. Describe the nature of the case. Describe the parties involved and provide a summary of the facts in the case.

2. Identify which of the antidiscrimination laws was violated in the case, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, ADEA, EPA, IRCA, ADA, or GINA.

3. Evaluate the seriousness and scope of the discrimination.

4. What could have been done to prevent the discriminatory practices in the first place? Provide specific action steps you would recommend.

5. Explain the relevant law in light of its historical context and why it was enacted. How does the law protect the offended workers in this case?

Paper Requirements:

Your paper should include an introduction and a conclusion and should be 3-4 pages long, not including the required title and reference pages.

Incorporate two scholarly references that are not required readings for this module.

In a well-written paper, answer the following about the case:

1. Describe the nature of the case. Describe the parties involved and provide a summary of the facts in the case.

2. Identify which of the antidiscrimination laws was violated in the case, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, ADEA, EPA, IRCA, ADA, or GINA.

3. Evaluate the seriousness and scope of the discrimination.

4. What could have been done to prevent the discriminatory practices in the first place? Provide specific action steps you would recommend.

5. Explain the relevant law in light of its historical context and why it was enacted. How does the law protect the offended workers in this case?

Paper Requirements:

Your paper should include an introduction and a conclusion and should be 3-4 pages long, not including the required title and reference pages.

Incorporate two scholarly references that are not required readings for this module.

In a well-written paper, answer the following about the case:

1. Describe the nature of the case. Describe the parties involved and provide a summary of the facts in the case.

2. Identify which of the antidiscrimination laws was violated in the case, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, ADEA, EPA, IRCA, ADA, or GINA.

3. Evaluate the seriousness and scope of the discrimination.

4. What could have been done to prevent the discriminatory practices in the first place? Provide specific action steps you would recommend.

5. Explain the relevant law in light of its historical context and why it was enacted. How does the law protect the offended workers in this case?

Paper Requirements:

Your paper should include an introduction and a conclusion and should be 3-4 pages long, not including the required title and reference pages.

Incorporate two scholarly references that are not required readings for this module.

*Must be 100% original and not plagrized*

This final assignment is designed to involve all of the main skills that you have learned during this course. In particular, your paper should demonstrate the ability to construct a deductively valid or inductively strong argument, clearly and accurately explain your reasoning, use high-quality academic sources to support the premises of your argument, fairly and honestly evaluate contrary arguments and objections, and identify fallacies and biases that occur within the arguments or objections presented.

You will continue to build on the option you chose in your Week One Initial Argument Paper. You will need to research a minimum of three scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library. (For further information about discovering and including scholarly research, take a look at the FindIt@AU Tutorial instructional resource.)

In your paper

Explain the topic you are addressing and your position on it. Provide a preview of your paper and a statement of your thesis in your opening paragraph. [Approximately 100 words]
For help crafting a good thesis statement, go to the Ashford Writing Center.
Present your main argument for your thesis in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line. Clearly indicate whether your argument is intended to be inductive or deductive. Follow up the presentation of your argument by clarifying the meaning of any premises that could use some explanation. [About 150 words]
If your argument is deductive, then it should be valid (in the strict logical sense of the word); if it is inductive, then it should be strong. Make sure to avoid committing logical fallacies within your argument (e.g., begging the question). Additionally, the premises should be true, to the best of your knowledge. If one of your premises has a pretty obvious counter-example, then you should either fix the argument so that it does not have this flaw, or later, in your paper (steps three through five) you should address the apparent counter-example (showing that it does not really refute the truth of your premise). Arguments that are not valid, not very strong, commit fallacies, or that have counter-examples that are not adequately addressed will not receive full credit.
Provide supporting evidence for the premises of your argument. [Approximately 350 words]
Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments (arguments whose conclusions are premises of the main argument), or other ways of demonstrating the truth of those premises. This section should include at least one scholarly research source.
Explain a strong objection to your argument. [Approximately 250 words]
Study what people on the other side of this question think about your reasoning and present the best possible objection that someone could have to your argument. Do not commit the straw man fallacy here. Reference at least one scholarlyresearch source. See the “Practicing Effective Criticism” section of Chapter 9 of the course text for more information.
Defend your argument against the objection. [Approximately 200 words]
Once you have presented the objection, indicate clearly how you might respond to it. It is acceptable to admit that reasonable people might disagree with you or that there might be an area in which your argument could be further strengthened, but you should do your best to explain why your argument is sound or cogent despite the objections.
Provide an appropriate conclusion. [Approximately 75 words]

This final assignment is designed to involve all of the main skills that you have learned during this course. In particular, your paper should demonstrate the ability to construct a deductively valid or inductively strong argument, clearly and accurately explain your reasoning, use high-quality academic sources to support the premises of your argument, fairly and honestly evaluate contrary arguments and objections, and identify fallacies and biases that occur within the arguments or objections presented.

You will continue to build on the option you chose in your Week One Initial Argument Paper. You will need to research a minimum of three scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library. (For further information about discovering and including scholarly research, take a look at the FindIt@AU Tutorial instructional resource.)

In your paper

Explain the topic you are addressing and your position on it. Provide a preview of your paper and a statement of your thesis in your opening paragraph. [Approximately 100 words]
For help crafting a good thesis statement, go to the Ashford Writing Center.
Present your main argument for your thesis in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line. Clearly indicate whether your argument is intended to be inductive or deductive. Follow up the presentation of your argument by clarifying the meaning of any premises that could use some explanation. [About 150 words]
If your argument is deductive, then it should be valid (in the strict logical sense of the word); if it is inductive, then it should be strong. Make sure to avoid committing logical fallacies within your argument (e.g., begging the question). Additionally, the premises should be true, to the best of your knowledge. If one of your premises has a pretty obvious counter-example, then you should either fix the argument so that it does not have this flaw, or later, in your paper (steps three through five) you should address the apparent counter-example (showing that it does not really refute the truth of your premise). Arguments that are not valid, not very strong, commit fallacies, or that have counter-examples that are not adequately addressed will not receive full credit.
Provide supporting evidence for the premises of your argument. [Approximately 350 words]
Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments (arguments whose conclusions are premises of the main argument), or other ways of demonstrating the truth of those premises. This section should include at least one scholarly research source.
Explain a strong objection to your argument. [Approximately 250 words]
Study what people on the other side of this question think about your reasoning and present the best possible objection that someone could have to your argument. Do not commit the straw man fallacy here. Reference at least one scholarlyresearch source. See the “Practicing Effective Criticism” section of Chapter 9 of the course text for more information.
Defend your argument against the objection. [Approximately 200 words]
Once you have presented the objection, indicate clearly how you might respond to it. It is acceptable to admit that reasonable people might disagree with you or that there might be an area in which your argument could be further strengthened, but you should do your best to explain why your argument is sound or cogent despite the objections.
Provide an appropriate conclusion. [Approximately 75 words]
For guidance about how to develop a conclusion see the Introductions and Conclusion resource from the Ashford Writing Center.

For further instruction on how to create arguments, see the How to Construct a Valid Main Argument and Tips for Creating an Inductively Strong Argument documents as well as the Contructing Valid Arguments Video. For an example of a completed Final Paper, see the annotated example The Ethics of Elephants in Circuses. Let your instructor know if you have questions about how to complete this paper.

In this class, you have three tutoring services available: Paper Review, Live Chat, and Tutor E-mail. Click on the Ashford Writing Center (AWC) tab in the left-navigation menu to learn more about these tutoring options and how to get help with your writing.

The Final Argument Paper

Must be 1,100 to 1,400 words in length, double-spaced, (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (for more information about how to create an APA reference list see the Ashford Writing Center APA References List webpage).
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Attachments:

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

Develop a compelling argument that you would present to the Board, making a case for creating a system forensics department and building a functional lab.
Describe the difference between corporate investigations and law enforcement investigations and determine why corporate investigations are an integral part of an information security program.
Explain the importance of employing dedicated system forensics specialists who are familiar with multiple computing platforms and the negative affect the lack of familiarization can have on an investigation.
Compare and contrast public laws and company policy in terms of computer forensics and identify the role each plays in an investigation.
Analyze the importance of using forensic specialists and professional conduct in an investigation and the affect this has in a court case and / or corporation investigation.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Identify the computer forensics investigation process.
Outline system forensics issues, laws, and skills.
Use technology and information resources to research advanced issues in computer forensics.
Write clearly and concisely about topics related to computer forensics planning using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

Develop a compelling argument that you would present to the Board, making a case for creating a system forensics department and building a functional lab.
Describe the difference between corporate investigations and law enforcement investigations and determine why corporate investigations are an integral part of an information security program.
Explain the importance of employing dedicated system forensics specialists who are familiar with multiple computing platforms and the negative affect the lack of familiarization can have on an investigation.
Compare and contrast public laws and company policy in terms of computer forensics and identify the role each plays in an investigation.
Analyze the importance of using forensic specialists and professional conduct in an investigation and the affect this has in a court case and / or corporation investigation.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Identify the computer forensics investigation process.
Outline system forensics issues, laws, and skills.
Use technology and information resources to research advanced issues in computer forensics.
Write clearly and concisely about topics related to computer forensics planning using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

Develop a compelling argument that you would present to the Board, making a case for creating a system forensics department and building a functional lab.
Describe the difference between corporate investigations and law enforcement investigations and determine why corporate investigations are an integral part of an information security program.
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

Develop a compelling argument that you would present to the Board, making a case for creating a system forensics department and building a functional lab.
Describe the difference between corporate investigations and law enforcement investigations and determine why corporate investigations are an integral part of an information security program.
Explain the importance of employing dedicated system forensics specialists who are familiar with multiple computing platforms and the negative affect the lack of familiarization can have on an investigation.
Compare and contrast public laws and company policy in terms of computer forensics and identify the role each plays in an investigation.
Analyze the importance of using forensic specialists and professional conduct in an investigation and the affect this has in a court case and / or corporation investigation.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Identify the computer forensics investigation process.
Outline system forensics issues, laws, and skills.
Use technology and information resources to research advanced issues in computer forensics.
Write clearly and concisely about topics related to computer forensics planning using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions

Compare and contrast public laws and company policy in terms of computer forensics and identify the role each plays in an investigation.
Analyze the importance of using forensic specialists and professional conduct in an investigation and the affect this has in a court case and / or corporation investigation.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Identify the computer forensics investigation process.
Outline system forensics issues, laws, and skills.
Use technology and information resources to research advanced issues in computer forensics.
Write clearly and concisely about topics related to computer forensics planning using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions