Discuss Development Cooperation and Unintended Consequences

Comment:
need a proposal for dissertation. The proposal is consist of introduction (include statement of problem), hypothesis, literature reviews theoretical framework, and methodology parts. Please find the files for detailed information. And for cross-check, would you update the draft article every 2 or 3 days? I don\’t want to lose the focus or topic of article. Thanks in advance!

Descuss Retail design report

Comment:
I have provided the assignment instruction, please note that this assignment is a group assignment, I\’ve already upload my group members sections of this assignment and please complete the remaining section 1, 3, 4 and 5 that I highlight according to section2. Also, I will email additional materials according to section 4 and our assignment 1 for section 5. The specific retailer we are studying is NOVO–a shoes retail shop https://www.novoshoes.com.au/shop-insta/ Note: Your comparison store (to your primary store) does NOT need to have an online presence as you are NOT evaluating its online presence in this assignment. Format: report

Explain Baptist Student Ministry at Texas A&M University-Commerce – Annotated Bibliography

Comment:
For English 1302
Discourse Communities
On the Baptist Student Ministry at Texas A&M University-Commerce

Annotated Bibliography (10%)
Since good ethnographic research involves both fieldwork and traditional library research, you will need to gather sources that inform what you learn in your fieldwork. These sources should be books, peer reviewed journal articles, and other relevant sources approved by your instructor. Since the research youre doing is scholarly, you will only use credible sources to support your claims. (That means no Wikipedia or Dictionary entries, for example.) You must annotate six items. These items will include proper bibliographic information followed by annotations. Three of your sources will be from in class texts (they must come from one of the text books), and your other three sources will be outside sources you find on your own.
Length: Annotations should be 80-100 words in length a piece not including bibliographic information.

my texts are:
Ethnographic Inquiries in writing ;Tabitha Adkins
and
Fieldworking fourth edition;Bonnie Sunstein, Elizabeth Chiseri-Strater

Also,
Annotations should answer three questions-
1) Argument: What is the purpose/argument of the text?
2) Methodology: How does the text make that argument?
3) Relation: How does the text relate to your own argument/research?

Discuss the key countries that might be associated with the risk Evaluate the role of ethical decision-making in business organizations Analyze the impact of business ethics on stakeholder relationships

Comment:
Ethics, Compliance Auditing, and Emerging Issues To prepare for this assignment, review Chapter 9 in the course text as well as the article on compliance program auditing by Usnick and Usnick (2013). In addition, read Chapter 10 in the course text. Review Table 10.3: Global Risks 2014, and select one of the risk areas. Imagine that you have been tasked with creating a proposal for the new CEO of your organization for establishing an ethics program and for conducting training and compliance auditing. For this assignment, write a persuasive essay in which you address the following: Describe an emerging global risk for 2015 and beyond Discuss the key countries that might be associated with the risk Evaluate the role of ethical decision-making in business organizations Analyze the impact of business ethics on stakeholder relationships. Include in your analysis why it is necessary to create an ethics program, conduct training, and engage in compliance auditing Design a training plan for ethical considerations and social responsibility as it relates to the key risk area and the countries you have selected Explain how the program will be implemented Synthesize the key considerations which must be in place Incorporate key words and phrases from Chapter 9 and Chapter 10 of the text and the article by Usnick and Usnick (2013). Be sure to cite all sources in the body of your paper and on the references page. The assignment Must be seven to ten double-spaced pages in length (not including the title page and references page) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the FSB APA guidance located in the classroom. Must include a separate title page with the following Title of paper Students name Course name and number Instructors name Date submitted Must use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text and the Usnick and Usnick (2013) article. Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the FSB APA guidance located in the classroom.

PowerPoint Presentation Revision

Comments:
Find below the remarks that the writer didn\’t correct in the ppt:
In slide #7 in the 5th bullet point, the writer should use more detail on the demography of managers, like managerial level or responsibility areas ,
the slide #9 the last bullet point about exploratory factor analysis, regarding this bullet point, explain in the speaker notes, what is KMO value? and what is Barlett\’s Test Of Sphericity?, and what is p-value?, and why when KMO is 0.902, and the Barletts Test of Sphericity = 1685.12 is significant at the p-value <0.001. For slide #10, the writer should explain what does the total variability of 26 variables mean, and what are the 26 variables Write in the speaker notes of the Hypothesis slides, what are the Hypothesis 1 and 2 and 3 that we have tested in the thesis, and in addition, explain what are the F1, F2, F3, F4 in the table of the hypothesis in the slide number 11

Discuss MLK\’s Case

Comment:
Research paper on Martin Luther King Jr. Who he was. History of his life leading up to his death. Who killed MLK, was he framed. How the case was done in regards to his death. Was the FBI behind MLK\’s death. Did his family believe the person who the FBI said did the crime. His after life and what that taught us of how the FBI did their investigation. Flaws in the investigation. How was the case presented in court.