crime

Write a three (3) page paper in which you:1 Select two (2) of the theories,  that a researcher could use to explain the cause of digital crime. Provide arationale to support your response. Theories to choose from:Deterrence theoryPsychological theorySocial structure theoryWhite-collar crime and stain theoryGeneral strain theorySocial process theoryStain theory2 ) Explain the manner in which the theory that you selected in Question 1relates to crime in general.3) Determine one (1) additional theory that a researcher could use to explain the cause of digital-crime and non-digital crime. Include one (1) example for each crime in question to support your response.4) Use three (3) quality references for this assignment, Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.Assignment must follow these formatting requirements:• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), withone-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must followAPA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for anyadditional instructions.• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’sname, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. Thecover page and the reference page are not included in the requiredassignment page length.

Workplace Strategies and Coping Mechanisms that Reduce Employee Stress and Increase Employee Efficiency and Productivity: 25 pages of Methodology for prior paper

advancedin accurate CH 3 (Methodology- Heuristic Inquiry and Narrative Approach (Storytelling)3.0 Explanation of what the two methodologies are and how they will be used for the Research Paper (Heuristic Inquiry and Narrative Approach)3.1 A lack of development in the literature 3.2 Transactional perspectives and the literature 3.3 Individual Differences and combined effects in the literature 3.4 Too little complexity in stress-related research 3.5 Too much complexity in stress-related research 3.6 A middle ground between simplicity and complexity 3.7 Rationale for research 3.8 Theoretical basis for variable selection 3.9 The issue of confounding variables 3.10 Summary of chapter 3 Heuristic inquiry does not exclude the researcher from the study; rather, it incorporates the researcher’s experiences with the experiences of co-researchers. The researcher is required to have a direct experience of the phenomenon in question (Moustakas, 1990) in order to discover its essence and meaning. As such, “heuristics is concerned with meanings, not measurements; with essence, not appearance; with quality, not quantity; with experience, not behavior” (Douglass & Moustakas, 1984, p. 42). However, heuristic inquiry is not a process without order. Instead, it requires the researcher to engage in a disciplined pursuit of fundamental meanings connected to significant human experiences. Both passionate and disciplined commitment to studying of human experiences is necessary to ensure trustworthiness. Heuristic research differs considerably from other methodologies in that it views the researcher as a participant. As such, it allows the researcher to experience the intensity of the phenomenon. In fact, in heuristic research researchers pursue the inherent truth of the meaning of the phenomenon through processes of reflective learning that is self-directed, self-motivated, and open to spontaneous change in direction (Douglass & Moustakas, 1985). It is the researcher who creates the story that depicts deep meanings and essences of unique human experiences (Moustakas, 1990). Such research is inherently personal and it allows for participants to have their stories understood and their voices heard. Furthermore, when participants are chosen for a heuristics study, they are not viewed as mere subjects in the study but as important co-researchers who are an integral part of the heuristic process (Moustakas).The heuristic process involves getting inside the research question, becoming one with it and living it. In this respect, it is the question that chooses the researcher. Sela-Smith (2002) acknowledged that this makes it a valuable tool in the exploration of the study of subjective human experience. Nursing practice and literature are replete with examples of how personal experience of healing, suffering, death, care, communication or stress, to mention but a few, has resulted in inquiry. Moustakas (1990) highlights that, if personal experience is going to be a catalyst for inquiry and change, it also requires that the qualities of tacit knowing and intuition are acknowledged. Narrative inquiry is an umbrella term that captures personal and human dimensions of experience over time, and takes account of the relationship between individual experience and cultural context (Clandinin and Connelly 2000). Narrative inquiry is a means by which we systematically gather, analyse, and represent people’s stories as told by them, which challenges traditional and modernist views of truth, reality, knowledge and personhood.Subjective meanings and sense of self and identity are negotiated as the stories unfold, … bearing in mind that stories are reconstructions of the person’s experiences, … remembered and told at a particular point in their lives, to a particular researcher/audience and for a particular purpose. This all has a bearing on how the stories are told, which stories are told and how they are presented/interpreted. They do not represent ‘life as lived’ but our re-presentations of those lives as told to us. ‘Narrative knowing’ Narrative knowledge – created and constructed through stories of lived experiences, and the meanings created. Helps make sense of the ambiguity and complexity of human lives. The stories are re-presented in ways that preserve their integrity and convey a sense of the ‘irreducible humanity’ of the person. Narrative analysis treats stories as knowledge per se which constitutes ‘the social reality of the narrator’ (Etherington, 2004:81) and conveys a sense of that person’s experience in its depth, messiness, richness and texture, by using the actual words spoken. It includes some of researchers part in that conversation in order to be transparent about the relational nature of the research, and the ways in which these stories are shaped through dialogue and co-construction, as well providing a reflexive layer with regard to researchers positioning.  

How has the definition of burglary changed from the old common law definition?

How has the definition of burglary changed from the old common law definition? Analyze the crime of burglary, including the actus reus and mens rea of burglary. Also provide a hypothetical example of a modern-day burglary.         Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be a minimum of one (1) single-spaced page to a maximum of two (2) pages in length.

Leadership Style

1) Select and describe a leader you admire.
2) Using leadership theories, analyze your selected leader to identify characteristics and provide specific examples of leadership qualities you think contributed to that person\’s success.
3) Evaluate your own leadership style and identify your own leadership characteristics.
4) Write a paper in which you explain your leadership style and your ideas and plans for improving your effectiveness as a leader based on your comparison with an admired leader.

Required Elements:
• No more than 1050 words
• Evaluate your chosen leader and yourself, based on the leadership theories.
Provide citations and references

Recruiting and Staff Plan

Assess the opening case study from Chapter 6: \”Amazon is Hiring…Big Time!” In a three- to five-page paper (not including the title and references pages), create a recruiting and staffing strategy for Amazon, and select one position from the given list to write a recruiting and staffing plan; consider how many of these positions Amazon needs to fill. You must select from the following full-time positions: Warehouse Supervisor, Delivery Representative, and Customer Service Manager.)Your paper must include the following:Carefully review the  for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Assignment 2.3: Justification Report – Part 3

, please view the \”Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment\” video in the Student Center., training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.Due Week 7 and worth 180 pointsIn Assignments 2.1 (Part 1) and 2.2 (Part 2) of the Justification Report, you built up the major parts of your formal, researched justification report (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, Methods, Evaluation of Alternatives, Findings and Analysis, and References). For Part 3 you will begin by inserting your revisions of Parts 1 and 2 based on your instructor’s suggestions. Then, you will include a few new sections.Some sections presented below are out of order so pay attention to where the section should go (for instance, the Transmittal should be the second page of your report based on the provided template). It is essential that you present the final report in the correct section order.Use the basic outline below to draft your paper. Organize your responses to each question under the following section headings:Using the provided template from Week 7, write Part 3 to complete a single-spaced report in which you:Remember to organize the report by the section headings. The report should reflect a style and format appropriate for business; single spacing and bullet points are acceptable for formal business reports.Your assignment must:The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Clickto view the grading rubric.  

Office Training Project – Basic Competencies

This portion of your project connects with a problem that many organizations are facing today, the skills gap. The skills gap refers to the difference between the skill requirements of available jobs and the skills possessed by job applicants.Cindy would like you to document how your training will assist in filling the skills gap connected with these employees. How might you assist the employees in the technical training they require in connection with the training topic you have chosen?Cindy has advised you also, that another office employee lacks in basic English skills. Maria was hired ten years ago by Fleet Trucking, after she and her family moved here from Malaysia. She has very limited English-speaking skills, but is the most valuable employee when it comes to organization of paperwork and files, scheduling drivers for deliveries, and keeping updated logbooks.Cindy is seeking confirmation that you have a plan on how to assist Maria, to ensure that she benefits from the training as greatly as the other trainees do. What can you do? Hire an interpreter? Coach Maria? Attempt to train a coach to work with her? What are your suggestions and why do you feel this will benefit Maria?

Raising Productivity

Your company is planning to implement a team-based approach to designing and creating packaging materials for clients. The purpose is to increase productivity and reduce cost.What training issues should your company address? Name two or three specific suggestions for how they should deal with them.Explain why skills training programs are important for long-term vitality of businesses.