EXplain What is your understanding of strategic supply chain management?

Comment:
Presentation structure 10 Marks (Includes formatting, layout, grammar, referencing and etc). Abstract (200 words,10 Marks) 1. Brief summary of the report 2. What are you doing? 3. What did you find? Introduction (200 words 10 Marks) 1. What is your understanding of strategic supply chain management? 2. What do you intend to do objectives/Questions. Literature review/Practice ( Balance of the word counts 2700+) Peered review journals of 30 references 1.Why do customers buy the companys product/service? 20 Marks 2.How is the company delivering the value proposition? 20 Marks 3.How should the value proposition be delivered? (identify the gaps) 20 Marks Conclusion (200 Words, 10 Marks) Explain alignment supply chain activity with supply chain strategy 1. Company name is OPS The website is: http://www.ops-sys.com/web/index.html 2.In the presentation slides, the process flow (slide 6); Receiving flow and Delivery Flow (slide 7) are the process flows of OPS warehouse only. 3.Please see excel file where the full process flow from Factory to OPS warehouse receiving and delivering out is there. 4.I have written the answers (MS words) to the questions (MS words) 5.Please put in diagrams and the process flow from the factory to warehouse. 6.Reference the diagrams. 7.30 journal articles is needed as started in the assignment brief 8.Please add in few websites as well. 9.Do the content page 10.Have headers and sub headers 11. The order winner of OPS is SPEED. Write why speed is important and if other company thinks speed is important. 12. put in diagram of the gaps identified. 13. read my lecture notes if need to add in things into the literature review.

Write a summary of the events which took place in Canada in the 1960s, concerning the adoption of the maple leaf as the flag of the country.

Comment:
Write a summary of the events which took place in Canada in the 1960s, concerning the adoption of the maple leaf as the flag of the country. The article, The Great Flag Debate, by Allan Levine will be your source text.
Your paper must follow all of the proper Chicago formatting rules. Your paper should have a minimum of three quotes from the source text. These quotes should include examples of all the types of quotes, with proper citations and footnotes, that were discussed in class.Accuracy in the use of Chicago formatting will be considered as part of your mark. A clear story based on the source text will form the bulk of your mark.
Summary should be Expository style make sure no plagaris 110 percent no plagarisim please write as master level and high qualti paper i already sent instruction i will send you more instructions make sure don\’t use anyothers idea or anyt hing cite and use proper formatting i will directly submit it previously as well i din\’t got good marks because formatting was not good enough strictly follow formatting manuals no plagarisim and perfect grammar thank you need to ask any thing regarding it feel free to contact me

Explain how banks can stay profitable in these times of very low economic activity and more and more regulations, limited investment options

Comment:
the topic is about how banks to stay profitable in these times of very low economic activity and more and more regulations, limited investment options; and especially it was for Bulgaria but if it is too specialize it could be the part for the word from you and I can add for Bulgaria for example some pages
11-12 font size, Calibri, Tines new roman, Arial, line spacing – 1.2-1.5
It is for Executive MBA program

What can law enforcement and public safety leaders learn from this communications case study?

Comment:
Presentation 3.1 Collaborative Communication: Forming Partnerships outlines how effective communications facilitates partnerships across agencies, with the community broadly, with community task forces, and community groups. With these guidelines in mind, choose a situation or scenario from the real world of law enforcement and public safety to serve as a Collaborative Communication case study for this assignment. Your case study should either: be a powerful example of how effective communication contributed to a good partnership that achieved many of its goals be a powerful example of how ineffective communication contributed to a poor partnership that failed to achieve many of its goals You have two options for the case study: Choose a situation or scenario from your professional life in law enforcement and public safety. Make sure the scenario is meaningful and compelling as a communications case study and also ethically appropriate to share with your professor. Choose a high-profile situation or scenario from law enforcement and public safety that received considerable attention from the media, the public and law enforcement and public safety entities. Make sure the scenario is meaningful and compelling as a communications case study. This assignment will be 3 pages maximum, double-spaced, using standard fonts and margins. With so many types of agencies and professions represented in this program, there is no one structural model for the assignment format. Rather, choose the format (traditional academic essay, formal report, memo etc.) that is the best fit for your current profession. Your work will be graded on organization, content, evidence and argumentation regardless of format. Summarize the professional scenario in a meaningful and succinct way (1 page maximum) Apply the criteria and guidelines from Presentation 3.1 Collaborative Communication: Forming Partnerships in a meaningful and rich way. Reflect on how the various law enforcement and public safety professionals involved in the scenario did or did not successfully employ the appropriate means of and approach to communication in developing the partnership. What can law enforcement and public safety leaders learn from this communications case study?