Author: custom-essay

Comment:
3. Analytical/Applied Essay (30% or points): A 10-page analytical/applied research paper that (1) addresses 4-5 theories and topics covered in Farazmands book plus at least 2 from the required readings (e.g., on motivation, leadership, groups, change, etc.) with implications for public service careers; and (2) applying their implications to a specific work situation or organization you have had experiences with in personal life (as an employee, a manger or supervisor, or citizen dealing with an organization). The essay must be typed in double-space, including references properly done using Chicago Manual Stylewhich is found in any article published in Public Administration Review or Public Organization Review. In-text citation, with a list of alphabetically ordered references at the end of the paper

Comment:
This is a self assessment for you to review all the work you have done in the major. Address each point below:
A. Theory
B. Professionalism
C. Critical Thinking
D. Communication; Reading, Writing, Verbal
E. Research and Evidence Based Practice
F. Effect on Your Future Practice
APA formatting is expected to include a title page. As this is a personal reflection, references are not required.
You need to write it in 1st person

The same course as in matrix assignment BUT DON\’T MIX IT UP
Reflective summary concerns the first part – First, it is designed to assist the graduate nursing student to reflect upon the MSN curriculum in relation to the Essentials of Masters Education in Nursing, The Graduate Level QSEN competencies and the AONE competencies for Nurse Executives.

Describe the reasons why operating within the scope of practice is important. The essay should include relevant legislation, bylaws, and protocols. What risks are the public, the Member, relevant agencies, other healthcare providers, and the College exposure.

Comment:
Making relevant to Canadian pre hospital and emergent care

Explain the State of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) at Citi Bank

how to apply psychology in marketing and digital marketing

Comment:
Follow the steps below to write a compare and contrast paper on Hofstedes six dimensions: Review the information provided on Hofstedes Six Dimensions of Culture in this weeks lecture. Choose two countries to compare using Hofstedes Six Dimensions of Culture. To compare the countries, access the Country Comparison section of The Hofstede Center website. Select one country in the dropdown menu to see that countrys values for the six dimensions. After you have selected that country, you can then select a second country to see a comparison of their scores. Consider how the cultural differences between these two countries impact work relationships. Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length. materials https://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html

Comment:
Hi, I need a lit-review based on the following articles. Please include all these papers in the literature review for the topic Methods of social media interaction. 1) Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 2)Hanna, R., Rohm, A., & Crittenden, V. L. (2011). Were all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54(3), 265-273. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007 3)Thackeray, R., Neiger, B. L., & Keller, H. (2012). Integrating Social Media and Social Marketing. Health Promotion Practice, 13(2), 165-168. doi:10.1177/1524839911432009 4)Kaplan, A. M. (2012). If you love something, let it go mobile: Mobile marketing and mobile social media 4×4. Business Horizons, 55(2), 129-139. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.009 5)Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., Mccarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005 6)Yan, J. (2011). Social media in branding: Fulfilling a need. Journal of Brand Management, 18(9), 688-696. doi:10.1057/bm.2011.19 7)Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, Like, Recommend. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 815-824. doi:10.1080/1461670x.2012.664430

Comment:
I do not want the new writer to build off of this paper at all, it is not correct. Please give the new writer all of the documents I have attached previously and all of my comments. There is no need to define the theory, define call centers, or teach on the subject. Please make sure each paragraph has a main idea, evidence to support the main idea (statistical data from studies-numerical data presented in statistical format), analysis of the evidence by the writer, and a lead out sentence to finish the paragraph and transition into the next paragraph or topic (MEAL format). I can forward over resources on the subject if needed. The current writer had the right idea on the references but did not cite the relevant data or compare/contrast findings from the different authors. Each paragraph should have at least 2 different citations (do not keep citing the same author over again or have only one author cited in a paragraph).

1. Introduction The introduction should briefly establish context for your paper and policy recommendation, and preview what readers will find in the subsequent sections of your paper. Establish the need, challenge, or problem related to prisoner reentry and mass incarceration that you are interested in. Provide one or two key facts, trends, and statistics as needed to establish the importance of this problem or challenge. These facts are meant to make readers interested in your manuscript and the policy problem it addresses. Highlight prior research that suggests this need or challenge exists and is important. Identify, briefly implications of this need or challenge (and, of not addressing it). Include a final paragraph of this section that is the goals paragraph. This paragraph should start with The goal of this paper similar to that which was included in your proposal. Then describe clearly how your paper is going to achieve its intended goal or otherwise make the case for your policy recommendation of choice. 2. Literature review First, summarize trends in mass incarceration and prisoner reentry in the United States Second, provide a clear, organized discussion of prior research related to your specific problem and attendant policy recommendation. This section should elaborate on the points made above, in your introduction. Expand on key facts, trends, and statistics from the introduction that establish your problem in the context of prisoner reentry and the need for a policy to address it. Use subheadings in this section to organize your writing. (For example, a paper focused on employment problems might have the following sub-headings: Prior research on prisoner reentry then Empirical studies of ex-prisoner unemployment and then Theory and research on in-prison programming targeting vocational training.) 3. Policy recommendation This section is the climax of the paper. It provides the main argument that you are making. Describe in clear detail the policy you are recommending. Provide support with theory, logic, argumentation, and prior research that this policy is needed, based on prior literature reviewed above, and most importantly, make a clear argument that the policy would have benefits. 4. Policy outcomes of interest Describe two to three specific outcomes that should result from this policy and that we can measure. (Without measurable outcomes, how else would we evaluate your policys effectiveness?) Consider outcomes that would show success of the policy, but also show indications of potential failure. To be clear, envision that you are, for example, a prison warden or a probation officer tasked with, say, implementing your recommended policy and measuring its good and bad effects. What specific measures would you recommend be tracked or observed to later evaluate it? 5. Potential limitations Identify two to three potential limitations of your policy recommendation. What are its potential shortcomings? What should policymakers look out for? In addition, identify one to two potential adverse consequences of your policy and how they might be avoided or counteracted. 6. Conclusions and next steps Summarize concisely the problem you focused on. Summarize concisely the policy recommendation for which you argued. Summarize concisely the potential consequences of your policy recommendation Identify two or three next steps for research on prisoner reentry and mass incarceration that would directly assist with the development of your policy recommendation and ameliorating your problem of interest.